This note details how Clearstar produces the APB Risk Rating, the composite risk score that determines whether a yield opportunity proceeds to Whitelisting or is routed to Improvements & Engagement. It is a part of the Capital Allocation Framework.
The APB Risk Rating combines four input reports into a single, tiered decision:
Each report includes letter grades for each assessment area and a composite numerical score. The APB Risk Rating aggregates these into a final tier (1 through 5), which directly governs whether and how capital may be allocated.
<aside> <img src="/icons/warning_red.svg" alt="/icons/warning_red.svg" width="40px" />
Automatic disqualification Any single letter grade of F in any assessment area across any of the four input reports results in automatic failure. The opportunity cannot proceed to Whitelisting until the F grade is resolved, either through the Improvements & Engagement feedback loop or by the project addressing the issue independently.
</aside>
flowchart TD
A[All DD reports received] --> FGATE{Step 1: Any F grade?}
FGATE -->|Yes| IE[Improvements and Engagement]
FGATE -->|No| COMP[Steps 2–3: Compute APB composite]
COMP --> TIER{Step 4: Assign tier}
TIER -->|Tier 1–4| DCHECK{Step 5: Any D grades?}
TIER -->|Tier 5| IE
DCHECK -->|No| WL[Whitelisting]
DCHECK -->|Yes| COND[Whitelisting with D-grade conditions]
IE --> RERUN[Project addresses issues, DD reruns]
RERUN --> A
style FGATE fill:#E8A838,stroke:#B8862D,color:#fff
style IE fill:#D9534F,stroke:#A94442,color:#fff
style WL fill:#5BB85B,stroke:#3D8B3D,color:#fff
style COND fill:#E8A838,stroke:#B8862D,color:#fff
style COMP fill:#4A90D9,stroke:#2E6BA6,color:#fff
Before the APB Risk Rating can be produced, all four DD reports must be complete and signed off by a senior analyst.
flowchart LR
GDD["General DD (6 areas)"] --> GS[General Score]
ADD["Asset DD (8 areas)"] --> AS[Asset Score]
PDD["Protocol DD (8 areas)"] --> PS[Protocol Score]
BDD["Blockchain DD (8 areas)"] --> BS[Blockchain Score]
GS & AS & PS & BS --> APB[APB Risk Rating]
style GDD fill:#E8A838,stroke:#B8862D,color:#fff
style ADD fill:#4A90D9,stroke:#2E6BA6,color:#fff
style PDD fill:#4A90D9,stroke:#2E6BA6,color:#fff
style BDD fill:#4A90D9,stroke:#2E6BA6,color:#fff
style GS fill:#E8A838,stroke:#B8862D,color:#fff
style AS fill:#4A90D9,stroke:#2E6BA6,color:#fff
style PS fill:#4A90D9,stroke:#2E6BA6,color:#fff
style BS fill:#4A90D9,stroke:#2E6BA6,color:#fff
style APB fill:#5BB85B,stroke:#3D8B3D,color:#fff
All four DD reports use the same letter grade scale:
| Grade | Meaning | Numerical Value |
|---|---|---|
| A | Excellent: no material concerns | 1.0 |
| B | Good: minor concerns, not material | 2.0 |
| C | Adequate: concerns warrant monitoring | 3.0 |
| D | Poor: significant concerns, material risk increase | 4.0 |
| F | Failing: critical issues, must be resolved | 5.0 (automatic disqualification) |